Jump to content

Other diazotroph marker genes: nifD, nifK

From OceanWiki
Revision as of 02:04, 10 February 2026 by Chreaa (talk | contribs) (Created page with " * Page authors: Christian Furbo Reeder, PRIMO * Responsible curator: Christian Furbo Reeder ---- __TOC__ <div class="model-box"> {| class="model-ib" ! What is being measured in 1 - 3 words |- | '''Approach:''' Sequencing |- | '''Context:''' ''Environmental'', incubation |- | '''Spatial scale:''' stations, across oceans |- | '''Temporal scale:''' days, seasons |- | '''Units:''' |- | '''Community capture...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)



What is being measured in 1 - 3 words
Approach: Sequencing
Context: Environmental, incubation
Spatial scale: stations, across oceans
Temporal scale: days, seasons
Units:
Community captured: all, can be size-fractionated
Co-measurements:

Method Overview

nifD and nifK amplicon sequencing targets genes encoding the α- and β-subunits of the molybdenum–iron (MoFe) protein of nitrogenase, respectively. These genes can be complementary to nifH sequencing and provide additional phylogenetic and functional resolution of diazotrophic communities. Environmental DNA is extracted, followed by PCR amplification of nifD and/or nifK using gene-specific primers. Amplicons are sequenced using high-throughput platforms, and resulting sequences are used to assess diazotroph diversity, composition, and relative abundance across environments.

Output

  • nifD and/or nifK amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) or operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
  • Taxonomic and phylogenetic assignment of diazotrophs
  • Relative abundance profiles of nifD/nifK variants


Scale of measurement

  • Molecular / gene-level
  • Semi-quantitative (relative abundance; absolute abundance requires complementary quantification)
  • Community-level inference of nitrogen fixation potential

Data generated

  • DNA sequence reads (FASTQ files)
  • ASV or OTU tables
  • Phylogenetic trees (often higher resolution than nifH)
  • Metadata-linked abundance matrices

Units & currency

  • Sequence counts
  • Relative abundance (%)
  • Reads per sample

Sample size

  • Varies by study design
  • Biological and technical replication recommended

Repositories & databases

  • nifDdada2, github – focused on nifD
  • NCBI GenBank – nifD and nifK reference sequences
  • ENA / SRA – raw sequencing reads
  • IMG/M – integrated microbial genomes and functional genes

Limitations

  • Lower primer coverage and fewer validated primer sets compared to nifH
  • Larger gene size can complicate amplification and sequencing
  • Lower reference database coverage relative to nifH
  • Does not directly measure nitrogen fixation activity
  • Horizontal gene transfer complicates evolutionary interpretation

Example Applications & Protocols

  • PCR amplification protocols adapted from specific primers
  • Custom laboratory SOPs due to limited standardized protocols

Classic examples

Common calculations/conversions

  • Relative abundance = (reads per nifD or nifK ASV) / (total nifD/nifK reads per sample)
  • Rarefaction to standardize sequencing depth
  • Phylogenetic clustering based on nifD/nifK sequences
  • Comparative analyses with nifH-derived community profiles

References